The proper measure of intrauterine growth retardation is function, not size
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 101 (12) , 1032-1035
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13576.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Charts of fetal size: 1. MethodologyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- An investigation of fetal growth using serial ultrasound dataUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993
- Authors' replyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Evidence of growth retardation in neonates of apparently normal weightEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1992
- Is obstetric and neonatal outcome worse in fetuses who fail to reach their own growth potential?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Intrauterine growth and spastic cerebral palsy II. The association with morphology at birthEarly Human Development, 1992
- Doppler investigation of uteroplacental blood flow resistance in the second trimester: a screening study for pre‐eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Antenatal Prediction of ‘Small-for-Dates' Babies. What Proportion are Growth Retarded?Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Intrauterine growth retardation: Let's be clear about itBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Longitudinal studies of fetal growth with the use of dynamic image ultrasonographyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982