The implications of linking questions within the SG and TTO methods
- 9 January 2004
- journal article
- outcome measurement
- Published by Wiley in Health Economics
- Vol. 13 (8) , 807-818
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.863
Abstract
We consider the impact of introducing intermediate stages, chained together, into the standard gamble (SG) and time trade‐off (TTO) methods. Less is known about the impact of intermediate stages, chained together, in the TTO method. We broadly replicate the patterns of responses observed in other SG studies which have been accounted for by loss aversion. We find that the TTO responses do not replicate the patterns found in the SG responses. The results support the notion that additional issues arise in the TTO method that counteract loss aversion. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- The TTO method and procedural invarianceHealth Economics, 2002
- A new explanation for the difference between time trade‐off utilities and standard gamble utilitiesHealth Economics, 2002
- Discrepancies between Chained and Classic Utilities Induced by Anchoring with Occasional AdjustmentsMedical Decision Making, 2002
- The Implications of Linking Questions within the SG and TTO MethodsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Patients' Utilities for Cancer TreatmentsMedical Decision Making, 1998
- Methodological Issues of Patient Utility Measurement Experience From Two Clinical TrialsMedical Care, 1995
- Preferences for sequences of outcomes.Psychological Review, 1993
- Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.Psychological Review, 1988
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrica, 1979