Improving the Field Triage of Major Trauma Victims
- 30 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health
- Vol. 28 (5) , 602-606
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198805000-00006
Abstract
The Trauma Scores, CRAMS scales, and mechanisms of injury of 500 trauma patients were evaluated for their ability to identify a seriously injured patient. Serious injury was defined as one of the following: Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, or emergency-room Trauma Score .ltoreq. 14, or injuries requiring > 3 days hospitalization, or death. With the addition of specific mechanisms of injury (auto vs. pedestrian accident at > 5 m.p.h., motor vehicle accident at > 40 m.p.h., motorcycle accident at > 20 m.p.h., or a major assault), the sensitivity of a field Trauma Score of < 14 could be improved from 45% to 75%, with a reasonable specificity of 40%. With these same mechanisms, the sensitivity of a CRAMS scale of .ltoreq. 8 increased from 66% to 93%, with a specificity of 30%. The addition of these mechanisms of injury to standard field triage scoring appears to improve the identification of seriously injured patients while retaining an acceptable level of overtriage.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Trauma Score as a triage tool in the prehospital settingJAMA, 1986
- A Method for Evaluating Field Triage CriteriaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1986
- Ineffectiveness of the trauma score and the CRAMS scale for accurately triaging patients to trauma centersAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1985
- Empirical Development and Evaluation of Prehospital Trauma Triage InstrumentsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1985
- Prospective Evaluation of the CRAMS Scale for Triaging Major TraumaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1985
- Impact of RegionalizationArchives of Surgery, 1983
- Validation of Autopsy Method for Evaluating Trauma CareArchives of Surgery, 1982