Limited Literacy Revisited Implications for Patient Education
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Practice
- Vol. 7 (3) , 145-150
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-5394.1999.07304.x
Abstract
Purpose : It is important to determine whether teaching materials are understood and deemed accurate by the cancer patients being served. The authors used a series of patient participatory interviews to evaluate two brochures: Chemotherapy: What It Is and How It Helps by the American Cancer Society; and Helping Yourself During Chemotherapy: 4 Steps for Patients by the National Cancer Institute. The authors sought to determine whether 1) the brochures were clear; 2) differences in presentation were perceived by patients; and 3) differences influenced respondents' understanding and opinions of the brochures. description of study : A qualitative, focus‐group methodology was used. Twelve cancer patients, eight of whom were women and six of whom were African American, were recruited from three outpatient clinics. Participants ranged in age from 31 to 62 years of age, and in education from completion of ninth grade to graduate school. Patients participated in a series of five groups, with a series of semistructured questions about content and format being asked of each group. All sessions were audiotaped. The investigators reviewed data both independently and together to identify content and format evaluations. results : Findings showed that most participants were drawn first by the National Cancer Institute format; the American Cancer Society brochure was seen as having more information; the two brochures were seen as complementary; some confusion arose from the content of both brochures; and the discussions of emotional and sexual aspects were important. clinical implications : These findings support the need for simple, clearly written brochures rather than brochures of varying literacy levels. The confusion caused by differences in advice given by the two organizations indicates the need to address specific areas in which dissimilarities exist. Finally, the project demonstrates the utility of patient focus groups for evaluation of patient education material.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving comprehension for cancer patients with low literacy skills: strategies for cliniciansCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1998
- Patient Teaching: Patient-Centered Teaching from Theory to PracticeThe American Journal of Nursing, 1998
- Literacy skills and communication methods of low-income older personsPatient Education and Counseling, 1995
- Reading Ability of Parents Compared With Reading Level of Pediatric Patient Education MaterialsPediatrics, 1994
- Educating patients with limited literacy skills: the effectiveness of printed and videotaped materials about colon cancer.American Journal of Public Health, 1994
- A theoretical perspective on attention and patient educationAdvances in Nursing Science, 1992
- Comprehension levels of patients reading health informationPatient Education and Counseling, 1991
- Brain function, learning styles, and cancer patient educationSeminars in Oncology Nursing, 1991
- Future trends in patient educationSeminars in Oncology Nursing, 1991
- Focus GroupsNursing Research, 1990