A Comparison of Four Methods of Scaling for the Acquisition of Early Number Concept
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of General Psychology
- Vol. 110 (1) , 23-45
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1984.9709945
Abstract
Four different methods of scaling for constructing a developmental scale of early number concept were compared: the Guttman scale analysis, the stochastic Mokken scale analysis, the ordering theoretic method, and the item tree analysis. Ss were 537 kindergarten and Grade 1 primary school children who were given three types of number comparison tasks, linear, linear-nonlinear, and nonlinear. The stochastic Mokken scale analysis was the most suitable one for constructing a developmental scale of these number comparison tasks. The final scale consisted of 12 equivalent number-comparison tasks, which together formed a strong Mokken scale. Implications for the development of early number concept are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardinal Equivalence of Small Number in Young ChildrenPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
- On the Sequentiality of Ordinality and CardinalityInternational Journal of Behavioral Development, 1981
- Effects of spatial cues on children's cardinal number judgments.Developmental Psychology, 1977
- Determination of the ordering among seven Piagetian tasks by an ordering-theoretic method.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974
- An Ordering-Theoretic Method to Determine Hierarchies Among ItemsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
- Mathematical and Behavioral Foundations of NumberThe Journal of General Psychology, 1973
- The Origins of Number ConceptsScientific American, 1973
- A Scalogram Study of Classificatory DevelopmentChild Development, 1966
- A method of scalogram analysis using summary statisticsPsychometrika, 1956
- A systematic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of ability.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1947