I. A History and review of methods, capabilities, and inherent limitations
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Toxicology- Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology
- Vol. 1 (2) , 91-108
- https://doi.org/10.3109/15569528209051515
Abstract
This is the first of two articles on the patch test. This first article contains a history and review of the various techniques for both prophetic and repeat insult patch testing by the originator of the most widely used repeat insult patch test technique. This is followed by a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of various patch test modifications, such as the cumulative irritancy test and the maximization procedure. After precisely defining the patch test, the author explores a number of limitations that must be taken into account when interpreting results from the patch test, such as the identity of the test material, the panelists or test population, the sensitivity and specificity of the procedure, variations in application site, seasonal variations, use of controls, and statistical considerations.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Langerhans' Cells in ImmunityArchives of Dermatology, 1980
- The Macrophage as a Regulator of Lymphocyte FunctionHospital Practice, 1979
- The development of allergic contact dermatitis in females during the comparison of two predictive patch testsContact Dermatitis, 1977
- Dermal and intravascular Langerhans cells at sites of passively induced allergic contact sensitivityCellular Immunology, 1975
- THE TREATMENT OF THE SCOLIOTIC PATIENTJAMA, 1936