EFFECTS OF HOST SOCIALITY ON ECTOPARASITE POPULATION BIOLOGY
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Parasitologists in Journal of Parasitology
- Vol. 90 (5) , 939-947
- https://doi.org/10.1645/ge-310r
Abstract
Theory predicts a positive relationship between parasite infection intensity and host density. However, this gener- alization is complicated in natural systems by differences in life history among parasite taxa, e.g., transmissibility. Accordingly, predictions relating host density to parasite load should be specific to each parasite taxon. To illustrate this, we studied parasites that differed greatly in life history in the context of the Galapagos hawk's (Buteo galapagoensis) variably cooperative mating system. Two louse (Phthiraptera) species were collected: Colpocephalum turbinatum (Amblycera), with 53 host species, and Degeeriella regalis (Ischnocera), with 10 host species, although B. galapagoensis was the only known Galapagos host. Sixty territorial adult male hawks from 26 groups of 1-6 males were quantitatively sampled for lice. Average abundance and intensity of C. turbinatum but not D. regalis were significantly larger in large groups of hawks than small groups. Males from the same polyandrous group harbored significantly correlated abundances of C. turbinatum but not D. regalis. Prevalence, average abun- dance, and intensity of C. turbinatum were significantly higher than D. regalis. These are the first results to demonstrate significant differences in a suite of population responses between these louse suborders in the context of host sociality. There are several presumed benefits and costs to group living (Alexander, 1974). The benefits, which may include direct and inclusive fitness returns and enhanced access to resources, have been the focus of intense investigation (e.g., Stacey and Koenig,Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- VARIATION IN MORPHOLOGY AND MATING SYSTEM AMONG ISLAND POPULATIONS OF GALÁPAGOS HAWKSOrnithological Applications, 2003
- The phylogeny of the louse genus Brueelia does not reflect host phylogenyBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2002
- Multiple Genes and the Monophyly of Ischnocera (Insecta: Phthiraptera)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2002
- HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ECTOPARASITE TRANSMISSION OF THREE SPECIES OF MALOPHAGA, AND INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN EUROPEAN BEE-EATERS (MEROPS APIASTER)Journal of Parasitology, 2001
- Reciprocal Natural Selection on Host‐Parasite PhenotypesThe American Naturalist, 1999
- Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communitiesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1998
- Louse Loads of Pied Flycatchers: Effects of Host's Sex, Age, Condition and RelatednessJournal of Avian Biology, 1995
- Parasites and Bright Male Plumage in the Satin Bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus)American Zoologist, 1990
- Regulation and Stability of Host-Parasite Population Interactions: I. Regulatory ProcessesJournal of Animal Ecology, 1978
- A quantitative approach to parasitismParasitology, 1971