Do Multilateral Trading Facilities Contribute to Market Quality?
Preprint
- 25 May 2011
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The introduction of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) ended the quasi-monopoly of traditional exchanges and enabled alternative platforms, so-called multilateral trading facilities (MTF), to compete for order flow. European regulation imposes neither a formal linkage nor a consolidated market record. This raises questions about the contribution to market quality of MTFs in an increasingly fragmented trading environment. We find that Chi-X, an MTF, contributes most to the price discovery process. Chi-X is competitive in liquidity supply and posts the tightest quoted spreads. Our results suggest that MTFs contribute positively to market quality and that investors benefit from competition.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competition in the market for NASDAQ securitiesJournal of Financial Markets, 2008
- Competition for Order Flow and Smart Order Routing SystemsThe Journal of Finance, 2008
- Toward a National Market System for U.S. Exchange–listed Equity OptionsThe Journal of Finance, 2004
- Competition among Trading Venues: Information and Trading on Electronic Communications NetworksThe Journal of Finance, 2003
- Issues in assessing trade execution costsJournal of Financial Markets, 2003
- A cross-exchange comparison of execution costs and information flow for NYSE-listed stocksJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- An Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book and the Order Flow in the Paris BourseThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- One Security, Many Markets: Determining the Contributions to Price DiscoveryThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Measuring the Information Content of Stock TradesThe Journal of Finance, 1991
- Components of the Bid‐Ask Spread and the Statistical Properties of Transaction PricesThe Journal of Finance, 1987