An improved statistical approach: Can it clarify the role of new prognostic factors for breast cancer?
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal Of Cancer
- Vol. 32 (11) , 1949-1956
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8049(96)00232-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Henrietta Banting Breast Centre database: A model for clinical research utilizing a hospital-based inception cohortJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Dangers of Using "Optimal" Cutpoints in the Evaluation of Prognostic FactorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1994
- The standardization of estrogen receptorsThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1993
- Evidence for bimodal distribution of breast carcinoma ER and PgR values quantitated by enzyme immunoassayEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1993
- A comparison of all-subset Cox and accelerated failure time models with Cox step-wise regression for node-positive breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1992
- Why do so many prognostic factors fail to pan out?Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1992
- Integrating prognostic factorsBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1992
- How To Use Prognostic Factors in Axillary Node-Negative Breast Cancer PatientsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1990
- The new stereological tools: Disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosisAPMIS, 1988
- Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosisAPMIS, 1988