Justice and allocation of medical resources.
- 27 July 1985
- Vol. 291 (6490) , 266-268
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.291.6490.266
Abstract
In one of a series of short articles on philosophical medical ethics, Gillon examines the principle of justice as it applies to adjudicating competing claims for the distribution of scarce medical resources. He describes Aristotle's theory of justice--with its demands of formal equity, impartiality, and fairness--and then considers various substantive criteria that have been proposed to justify choosing among competing candidates for scarce resources. In the absence of an acceptable way to give consistent moral priority to any of the criteria, he concludes, practical systems should be set up to resolve conflicts by taking into account the fundamental moral values of respect for autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence while incorporating Aristotle's formal principle of justice.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- When is discontinuation of dialysis justified ?The Lancet, 1985
- Medical ethics: an excuse for inefficiency?Journal of Medical Ethics, 1984
- Rationing health care.BMJ, 1984
- Allocating Scarce Medical Resources and the Availability of Organ TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Health-care needs and distributive justice.1981
- Triage and the patient with renal failure.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1980
- RelevancePublished by Springer Nature ,1978
- The idea of equalityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1973
- Selection of patients for haemodialysis. Surgeon's point of view.BMJ, 1967