Index Event Bias as an Explanation for the Paradoxes of Recurrence Risk Research
Top Cited Papers
- 23 February 2011
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 305 (8) , 822-823
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.163
Abstract
A review of the recurrence risk literature uncovers several paradoxical observations: thrombophilias predispose for a first episode of deep venous thrombosis (DKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Absence of obesity paradox in patients with chronic heart failure and diabetes mellitus: a propensity‐matched studyEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2011
- Is Patent Foramen Ovale a Modifiable Risk Factor for Stroke Recurrence?Stroke, 2010
- Prior Aspirin Use and Outcomes in Acute Coronary SyndromesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010
- Unraveling the thrombophilia paradox: from hypercoagulability to the prothrombotic stateJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2010
- Current Management and Risk of Recurrent Stroke in Cerebrovascular Patients with Right-to-Left Cardiac ShuntCerebrovascular Diseases, 2009
- Prevalence and Repair of Intraoperatively Diagnosed Patent Foramen Ovale and Association With Perioperative Outcomes and Long-term SurvivalJAMA, 2009
- Causal Directed Acyclic Graphs and the Direction of Unmeasured Confounding BiasEpidemiology, 2008
- A Structural Approach to Selection BiasEpidemiology, 2004
- The impact of obesity on the short-term andlong-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: the obesity paradox?Published by Elsevier ,2002
- Evaluation of paradoxic beneficial effects of smoking in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Mechanism of the “smoker's paradox” from the GUSTO-I trial, with angiographic insightsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995