Assessment of Operative Risk in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Colorectal Cancer Model
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 47 (12) , 2015-2024
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0704-y
Abstract
Predictive models play a pivotal role in the provision of risk-adjusted, operative mortality rates. The purpose of the study was to describe the development of a dedicated prognostic index for quantifying operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery. Data were collected from 5,034 consecutive patients undergoing major surgery in a single center from October 1976 to July 2002. Primary end point was 30-day operative mortality. A multilevel Bayesian logistic regression model was developed to adjust for case-mix and accommodate the variability of outcomes between surgeons. The model was internally validated (split-sample) and tested using measures of discrimination, calibration, and subgroup analysis. The patients' median age was 66 (range, 18-98) years. Operative mortality was 2.3 percent with no significant variability between surgeons or through time. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors: age (odds ratio = 1.5 per 10-year increase), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (odds ratio for ASA II, III, IV-Vvs. I = 2.6, 4.3, 6.8), TNM staging (odds ratio for Stage IVvs. I-III = 2.6), mode of surgery (odds ratio for urgentvs. nonurgent = 2.1) no-cancer resectionvs. cancer resection (odds ratio = 4.5), and hematocrit level. The model offered adequate discrimination (area under receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.801) and excellent agreement between observed and model-predicted outcomes over ten major colorectal procedures (P= 0.191). The colorectal cancer model provided an accurate means of estimating risk for individual patients in the preoperative setting. It has important implications in everyday practice, because it may be used as an adjunct in the process of informed consent and for monitoring surgical performance through time.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Commissioned Analysis of Surgical Performance Using Routine Data: Lessons from the Bristol InquiryJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2002
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Teaching and Nonteaching Hospitals in the Department of Veterans AffairsAnnals of Surgery, 2001
- Applied Logistic RegressionPublished by Wiley ,2000
- An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring systemBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996
- MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- The APACHE III Prognostic SystemChest, 1991
- POSSUM: A scoring system for surgical auditBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982