The Six Year Experience of Plasmapheresis in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Plasmapheresis (PP) effectively removes autoantibodies in various autoimmune diseases. The use of PP in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) has been widely accepted since the 1970s. The treatment protocol, however, has not been standardized. For the last 6 years, we collected a total of 94 MG patients, 38 males and 56 females aged 14–80 years, who received 175 courses of PP treatment for a total of 823 sessions. The methods we used were double filtration plasmapheresis (DF), immunoadsorption plasmapheresis (IA), and plasma exchange (PE). There were 167 courses of DF, 6 courses of IA, and 2 courses of PE. Each course of treatment consists of 4 to 5 sessions of apheresis. The processed volume of plasma is 1 calculated plasma volume. All patients tolerated PP well although 2.3% of them experienced hypotension. Our experiences are summarized as follows. Both DF and IA effectively ameliorate symptoms and signs of MG. IA removes acetylcholine receptor antibody more effectively than DF does, but clinical effects between these 2 methods are similar. A daily schedule seems more effective than an alternate daily schedule. The optimal number of PP sessions for each course is 4. The factors correlating with better clinical response are high MG score, nonthymoma patients, younger age at onset, and higher removal rate for immunoglobulin G.