Must We Fear a Post-Cold War Multipolar System?
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 36 (3) , 573-585
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002792036003007
Abstract
The probable transition from a bipolar to a multipolar international system has inspired divergent predictions about the likely consequences for global stability. This article places two recent exemplary deductive models under examination, in order to evaluate the validity of their conclusions about the alleged stability of the cold war's bipolar competitive world relative to that of multipolar systems. A review of the empirical evidence generated by inductive investigations of this relationship suggests that acceptance of the pessimistic thesis that multipolar systems are inherently unstable would be premature, and that, if intervening variables are considered, a rival, more pacific image of a future multipolar world is equally plausible.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Polarity, the Offense-Defense Balance, and WarAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- The “Long Peace”—Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1991
- Changing International Systems, the World Balance of Power, and the United States, 1776?1976Diplomatic History, 1991
- Stability in Anarchic International SystemsAmerican Political Science Review, 1990
- Polarity and stability: New concepts, indicators and evidenceInternational Interactions, 1990
- Power, Alliance, and Major Wars, 1816-1975Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1989
- Predictability, Chaos, and the Transition to WarBulletin of Peace Proposals, 1986
- Alliance Norms and War: A New Piece in an Old PuzzleInternational Studies Quarterly, 1982
- Bipolarity and Bipolarization in the Cold War EraJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1979
- Alliance Polarization, Cross-Cutting, and International War, 1815-1964Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1973