Buying Time: Real and Hypothetical Offers
Preprint
- 24 September 1996
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
This paper provides the results of a field test of contingent valuation estimates within a willingness to accept framework. Using dichotomous choice questions in telephone- mail-telephone interviews, we compare responses to real and hypothetical offers to survey respondents for the opportunity to spend time in a second set of interviews on an undisclosed topic. Five hundred and forty people were randomly split between the real and hypothetical treatments. Our findings indicate no significant differences between people's choices with real and hypothetical offers. Choice models indicate the size of the offer and income were significant determinants of respondents' decisions, and these models were not significantly different between real and hypothetical offers.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Was the NOAA Panel Correct about Contingent Valuation?SSRN Electronic Journal, 1997
- Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good?Land Economics, 1996
- Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regressionJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1988
- Time and the Recreational Demand ModelAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1987
- Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative StudyJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Rationing by Waiting and the Value of Time: Results from a Natural ExperimentJournal of Political Economy, 1985
- Contractual exchange and the timing of paymentJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1980
- Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979
- The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market MechanismThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970