Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 17 (7) , 2190
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.7.2190
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between gemcitabine and paclitaxel in a phase I/II study in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with advanced NSCLC received the following in a 3-week schedule: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 (30 minutes, days 1 and 8) and paclitaxel 150 (n = 9) or 200 mg/m2 (n = 9) before gemcitabine (3 hours, day 1). Plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in mononuclear cells were studied. RESULTS: Gemcitabine did not influence paclitaxel pharmacokinetics at 150 and 200 mg/m2 (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 7.7 and 8.8 μmol/ L · h, respectively; maximum plasma concentration [Cmax], 3.2 and 4.0 μmol/L, respectively), and paclitaxel did not influence that of gemcitabine (Cmax, 30 ± 3 μmol/L) and 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyuridine. Paclitaxel, however, dose-dependently increased the Cmax of gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP), the active metabolite of gemcitabine, from 55 ± 10 to 106 ± 16 pmol/106 cells. No significant difference in the AUC of dFdCTP was observed. Moreover, the gemcitabine-paclitaxel combination significantly increased ribonucleotide levels, most pronounced for adenosine triphosphate (six- to seven-fold). Postinfusion paclitaxel AUC was related to pretreatment hepatic function (bilirubin: r = 0.79; P < .001) and to the percentage decrease in platelets (r = 0.61; P = .009). The latter was also related to the duration of paclitaxel concentration above 0.1 μmol/L (r = 0.62; P = .007). Gemcitabine Cmax was related to the percentage decrease in platelets (r = 0.58; P = .01), pretreatment hepatic function (bilirubin: r = 0.77; P < .001), and to plasma creatinine (r = 0.5; P = .03). The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were not related to response or survival. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine and paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were related to the percentage decrease in platelets. Paclitaxel did not affect the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine, nor did gemcitabine affect the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, but paclitaxel increased dFdCTP accumulation. This might enhance the antitumor activity of gemcitabine.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cell cycle disturbances and apoptosis induced by topotecan and gemcitabine on human lung cancer cell linesEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1999
- Experience With New Chemotherapeutic Agents in Non-small Cell Lung CancerChest, 1998
- GemcitabineDrugs, 1997
- Leading Article: Oncologic, Endocrine & Metabolic: New antimetabolites in preclinical and clinical developmentExpert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, 1996
- Preclinical characteristics of gemcitabineAnti-Cancer Drugs, 1995
- Comparison of the induction of apoptosis in human leukemic cell lines by 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) and cytosine arabinosideLeukemia Research, 1995
- New drugs in non-small cell lung cancer. An overviewLung Cancer, 1995
- Paclitaxel (Taxol)New England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- 2′,2′-Difluoro-deoxycytidine (gemcitabine) incorporation into RNA and DNA of tumour cell linesBiochemical Pharmacology, 1993
- Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxolNature, 1979