Disease Stigma in U.S. Public Health Law
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
- Vol. 30 (2) , 179-190
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00385.x
Abstract
Stigma has become an important concept in public health law. It is widely accepted that certain diseases are disfavored in society, leading to discrimination against people identified with them, which in turn has the tendency to drive an epidemic underground—i.e., to make it more difficult for voluntary public health programs to reach and succeed among populations bent on concealing their disease or risk status. The need to reduce stigma and its effects has been used to justify the passage of privacy and antidiscrimination law to protect people with HIV. More recently, stigma has been part of the arsenal of justification for special genetic antidiscrimination and privacy law. Despite its importance, however, there is no single widely accepted definition of stigma in social science, and its relationship to law has been generally under-theorized and unsupported by data, reducing our ability to effectively deploy law and other tools in the anti-stigma cause.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stigma: An Insider's ViewJournal of Social Issues, 2001
- Social Norms: Internalization, Persuasion, and HistoryLaw & Society Review, 2000
- The Rights Revolution and Support Structures for Rights AdvocacyLaw & Society Review, 2000
- The Secret Ambition of DeterrenceHarvard Law Review, 1999
- A Social-Psychological Analysis of HIV-Related StigmaAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1999
- The Problem of “Us” Versus “Them” and AIDS StigmaAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1999
- AIDS Stigma and Sexual PrejudiceAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1999
- Stigma and disease: changing paradigmsThe Lancet, 1998
- Rights, Remembrance, and the Reconciliation of DifferenceLaw & Society Review, 1996
- Cooperation and Conflict: The Economics of Group Status Production and Race DiscriminationHarvard Law Review, 1995