At Least One Intron Is Required for the Nonsense-Mediated Decay of Triosephosphate Isomerase mRNA: a Possible Link between Nuclear Splicing and Cytoplasmic Translation
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Vol. 18 (9) , 5272-5283
- https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.18.9.5272
Abstract
Mammalian cells have established mechanisms to reduce the abundance of mRNAs that harbor a nonsense codon and prematurely terminate translation. In the case of the human triosephosphate isomerase (TPI gene), nonsense codons located less than 50 to 55 bp upstream of intron 6, the 3′-most intron, fail to mediate mRNA decay. With the aim of understanding the feature(s) of TPI intron 6 that confer function in positioning the boundary between nonsense codons that do and do not mediate decay, the effects of deleting or duplicating introns have been assessed. The results demonstrate that TPI intron 6 functions to position the boundary because it is the 3′-most intron. Since decay takes place after pre-mRNA splicing, it is conceivable that removal of the 3′-most intron from pre-mRNA “marks” the 3′-most exon-exon junction of product mRNA so that only nonsense codons located more than 50 to 55 nucleotides upstream of the “mark” mediate mRNA decay. Decay may be elicited by the failure of translating ribosomes to translate sufficiently close to the mark or, more likely, the scanning or looping out of some component(s) of the translation termination complex to the mark. In support of scanning, a nonsense codon does not elicit decay if some of the introns that normally reside downstream of the nonsense codon are deleted so the nonsense codon is located (i) too far away from a downstream intron, suggesting that all exon-exon junctions may be marked, and (ii) too far away from a downstream failsafe sequence that appears to function on behalf of intron 6, i.e., when intron 6 fails to leave a mark. Notably, the proposed scanning complex may have a greater unwinding capability than the complex that scans for a translation initiation codon since a hairpin structure strong enough to block translation initiation when inserted into the 5′ untranslated region does not block nonsense-mediated decay when inserted into exon 6 between a nonsense codon residing in exon 6 and intron 6.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- T Cell Receptor (TCR) Mini-Gene mRNA Expression Regulated by Nonsense Codons: A Nuclear-associated Translation-like MechanismThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1997
- Evidence that translation reinitiation abrogates nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in mammalian cellsThe EMBO Journal, 1997
- Cytoplasmic mRNA for human triosephosphate isomerase is immune to nonsense-mediated decay despite forming polysomesBiochimie, 1996
- Making sense of nonsense in yeastTrends in Biochemical Sciences, 1996
- A Pre-mRNA-Binding Protein Accompanies the RNA from the Gene through the Nuclear Pores and into PolysomesCell, 1996
- A Regulatory Mechanism That Detects Premature Nonsense Codons in T-cell Receptor Transcripts in Vivo Is Reversed by Protein Synthesis Inhibitors in VitroJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1995
- GCD10, a translational repressor of GCN4, is the RNA-binding subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor-3.Genes & Development, 1995
- Upstream introns influence the efficiency of final intron removal and RNA 3'-end formation.Genes & Development, 1994
- Shuttling of pre-mRNA binding proteins between nucleus and cytoplasmNature, 1992
- Regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing by hnRNP A1 and splicing factor SF2Cell, 1992