Obstetric technologies: What determines clinical acceptance or rejection of results of randomized controlled trials?
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 188 (6) , 1622-1628
- https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.394
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Historical Controversy in Health Technology Assessment:Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2001
- Tocolytics for preterm labor: a systematic review*1Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Fetal anomaly detection by second-trimester ultrasonography in a tertiary centerAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Research guidelines for interpretationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Research Guidelines for Interpretation: The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning WorkshopJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 1997
- Elimination of Fetal Scalp Blood Sampling on a Large Clinical ServiceObstetrics & Gynecology, 1994
- Effect of Prenatal Ultrasound Screening on Perinatal OutcomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Home Uterine Activity Monitoring for Preterm LaborJAMA, 1993
- Intrapartum fetal surveillance: The role of fetal scalp blood samplingAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoringAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979