Floral homeotic mutations produced by transposon-mutagenesis in Antirrhinum majus.
Open Access
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Genes & Development
- Vol. 4 (9) , 1483-1493
- https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.4.9.1483
Abstract
To isolate and study genes controlling floral development, we have carried out a large-scale transposon-mutagenesis experiment in Antirrhinum majus. Ten independent floral homeotic mutations were obtained that could be divided into three classes, depending on whether they affect (1) the identity of organs within the same whorl; (2) the identity and sometimes also the number of whorls; and (3) the fate of the axillary meristem that normally gives rise to the flower. The classes of floral phenotypes suggest a model for the genetic control of primordium fate in which class 2 genes are proposed to act in overlapping pairs of adjacent whorls so that their combinations at different positions along the radius of the flower can specify the fate and number of whorls. These could interact with class 1 genes, which vary in their action along the vertical axis of the flower to generate bilateral symmetry. Both of these classes may be ultimately regulated by class 3 genes required for flower initiation. The similarity between some of the homeotic phenotypes with those of other species suggests that the mechanisms controlling whorl identity and number have been highly conserved in plant evolution. Many of the mutations obtained show somatic and germinal instability characteristic of transposon insertions, allowing the cell-autonomy of floral homeotic genes to be tested for the first time. In addition, we show that the deficiens (def) gene (class 2) acts throughout organ development, but its action may be different at various developmental stages, accounting for the intermediate phenotypes conferred by certain def alleles. Expression of def early in development is not necessary for its later expression, indicating that other genes act throughout the development of specific organs to maintain def expression. Direct evidence that the mutations obtained were caused by transposons came from molecular analysis of leaf or flower pigmentation mutants, indicating that isolation of the homeotic genes should now be possible.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic interactions underlying flower color patterns in Antirrhinum majus.Genes & Development, 1989
- The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in DrosophilaNature, 1988
- Transposable elements generate novel spatial patterns of gene expression in antirrhinum majusCell, 1986
- Resurgence of genetic instability in Antirrhinum majusMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 1979
- A comparison of the instabilities at the Nivea and Pallida loci in Antirrhinum majusHeredity, 1973
- THE INTERPRETATION OF THE FLOWER: A STUDY OF SOME ASPECTS OF MORPHOLOGICAL THOUGHTBiological Reviews, 1937
- Über vier neue Serien multipler Allele beiAntirrhinum majusMolecular Genetics and Genomics, 1936
- Die Erbfaktoren beiAntirrhinum majus und ihre BezeichnungMolecular Genetics and Genomics, 1930
- Ein neuer Fall von multiplem Allelomorphismus bei AntirrhinumMolecular Genetics and Genomics, 1926
- The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication.Charles DarwinThe American Naturalist, 1868