Use of Retrievable Compared to Permanent Inferior Vena Cava Filters: A Single-Institution Experience
- 23 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
- Vol. 31 (2) , 308-315
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9184-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experience with the Recovery Filter as a Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava FilterJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2005
- Aortic Pseudoaneurysm after Penetration by a Simon Nitinol Inferior Vena Cava FilterJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2005
- Removal of Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter through Femoral Vein ApproachJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2005
- Extended Interval for Retrieval of Günther Tulip FiltersJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2004
- Inferior Vena Caval Filters: Review of a 26-year Single-Center Clinical ExperienceRadiology, 2000
- Twenty-year clinical experience with the Greenfield filterCardiovascular Surgery, 1995
- Vena Tech-LGM filter: long-term results of a prospective study.Radiology, 1993
- Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters: follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients.Radiology, 1993
- Vena Caval Occlusion after Simon Nitinol Filter Placement: Identification with MR Imaging in Patients with MalignancyJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 1992
- Percutaneous insertion of the Kimray-Greenfield filter: incidence of femoral vein thrombosisAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1987