Should Stamey colposuspension be our primary surgery for stress incontinence?
- 1 April 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 75 (4) , 457-460
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07265.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical results and urodynamic studies 10 years after retropubic colpourethrocystopexyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1993
- Stamey‐Martius Procedure for Severe Genuine Stress IncontinenceBritish Journal of Urology, 1992
- Surgical Management of Stress Incontinence in Patients with Low Urethral PressureGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 1991
- Long-term Results of ColposuspensionBritish Journal of Urology, 1990
- Follow‐up Results with the Stamey Operation for Stress Incontinence of UrineBritish Journal of Urology, 1990
- Comparison of Stamey and Pereyra‐Raz Bladder Neck SuspensionsBritish Journal of Urology, 1989
- A clinical and urodynamic study comparing the Stamey bladder neck suspension and suburethral sling procedures in the treatment of genuine stress incontinenceBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Modified Stamey Procedure for Bladder Neck SuspensionBritish Journal of Urology, 1989
- Stamey Needle Suspension for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Study of 40 PatientsBritish Journal of Urology, 1989
- Videourodynamic Assessment of the Stamey Procedure for Stress IncontinenceBritish Journal of Urology, 1988