A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 3 January 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 14 (1) , 2
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
Abstract
The gap between research and practice or policy is often described as a problem. To identify new barriers of and facilitators to the use of evidence by policymakers, and assess the state of research in this area, we updated a systematic review.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and cliniciansCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012
- Galvanizers, Guides, Champions, and Shields: The Many Ways That Policymakers Use Public Health ResearchersThe Milbank Quarterly, 2011
- Employing policy and purchasing levers to increase the use of evidence-based practices in community-based substance abuse treatment settings: Reports from single state authoritiesEvaluation and Program Planning, 2011
- Communicating Evidence-Based Information on Cancer Prevention to State-Level Policy MakersJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011
- Research and Advice Giving: A Functional View of Evidence‐Informed Policy Advice in a Canadian Ministry of HealthThe Milbank Quarterly, 2009
- The use of evidence in public governmental reports on health policy: an analysis of 17 Norwegian official reports (NOU)BMC Health Services Research, 2009
- The Voice of Experience: How Social Scientists Communicate Family Research to PolicymakersFamily Relations, 2009
- “Developing Good Taste in Evidence”: Facilitators of and Hindrances to Evidence‐Informed Health Policymaking in State GovernmentThe Milbank Quarterly, 2008
- Being around and knowing the players: Networks of influence in health policySocial Science & Medicine, 2006
- FACTORS AFFECTING THE UTILIZATION OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2001