Chinese Adolescents' Reasoning About Democratic and Authority‐Based Decision Making in Peer, Family, and School Contexts

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This study explored the judgments and reasoning of Chinese adolescents (13–18 years of age) from 3 regions of mainland China (N=574) regarding procedures for making decisions involving children in peer, family, and school contexts. Participants evaluated 2 democratic decision‐making procedures (majority rule and consensus) and decision making by adult authorities for 2 decisions embedded in each social context. Judgments and reasoning about decision‐making procedures varied by social context and by the decision under consideration, and evaluations of procedures became more differentiated with increasing age. The findings reveal that concepts of rights, individual autonomy, and democratic norms (majority rule) are salient aspects of Chinese adolescents' social reasoning and are used to evaluate critically existing social practices.