On Distinguishing Natural from Cultural Bone in Archaeological Sites
- 1 July 1971
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 36 (3) , 366-371
- https://doi.org/10.2307/277722
Abstract
A quantitative method is presented which assists the archaeologist in distinguishing between bones resulting from human activity and those deposited in archaeological contexts by non-cultural means. The assumption is that relatively incomplete carcasses are more likely to have been deposited or disturbed by extra-corporeal activities such as carnivores, raptorial birds, rodents, stream action, or man. This method is illustrated on faunal data from 3 sites in the High Rock county of extreme northwestern Nevada.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Great Basin Hunting Patterns: A Quantitative Method for Treating Faunal RemainsAmerican Antiquity, 1969
- Flotation Techniques for the Recovery of Small-Scale Archaeological RemainsAmerican Antiquity, 1968
- Archaeological Applications of Factor, Cluster, and Proximity AnalysisAmerican Antiquity, 1968
- Ecology and Distribution of Pocket Gophers (Geomyidae) in ColoradoEcology, 1964
- Ecology of pocket gophers with emphasis onThomomys bottae mewaHilgardia, 1959
- Inter‐Community Relationships in Hemphillian (Mid‐Pliocene) MammalsEcology, 1958
- An Approach to the Paleoecology of MammalsEcology, 1955
- A Method of Calculating the Dietary Percentage of Various Food Animals Utilized by Aboriginal PeoplesAmerican Antiquity, 1953