A Minimal Model of the Single Capacitor Biphasic Defibrillation Waveform
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 17 (11) , 1782-1792
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb03746.x
Abstract
A quantita tive model of the single capacitor biphasic defibrillation wave form is proposed. The primary hypothesis of this model is that the first phase leaves a residual charge on the membranes of the unsynchronized cells, which can then reinitiate fibrillation. The second phase diminishes this charge, reducing the potential for refibrillation. To suppress this potential refibrillation, a monophasic shock must be strong enoagh to synchronize a critical mass of nearly 100% of the myocytes. Since the biphasic waveform performs this protection function by removing the residual charge (with its second phase), its first phase may be of a lower strength than a monophasic shock of equivalent performance. A quantitative model was developed to calculate the residual membrane voltage, Vm, assuming a capacitive membrane being alternately charged and discharged by the first and second phases, respectively. It was further assumed that the amplitude of the first phase would be predicted by a minimum value plus a term proportional to Vm2. The model was evaluated on the pooled data of three relevant published studies comparing biphasic waveforms. The model explained 79% of the variance in the first phase amplitude and predicted optimal durations for various defibrillator capacitances and electrode resistances. Assuming a first phase of opti mal duration, the optimal second phase duration appears to be about 2.5 msec for all capacitances and resistances now seen clinically. Conclusion: The effectiveness of the single capacitor biphasic waveform may be explained by the second phase “burping” of the deleterious residual charge of the first phase that, in turn, reduces the synchronization requirement and the amplitude requirements of the first phase.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the Second Phase of a Biphasic Defibrillation Waveform the Defihrillating Phase?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1993
- Comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for defibrillation using a nonthoracotomy systemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Efficacy of short and long monophasic and biphasic waveforms in internal and external defibrillationAmerican Heart Journal, 1992
- Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leadsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Propagation Versus Delayed Activation During Field Stimulation of Cardiac MusclePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
- A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humansJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Improved internal defibrillation efficacy with a biphasic waveformAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: The importance of phasic durationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Improved low energy defibrillation efficacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncated exponential waveformAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Equivalent Circuit of Frog Atrial Tissue as Determined by Voltage Clamp-Unclamp ExperimentsThe Journal of general physiology, 1971