Analysis of English Nonsense Syllable Recognition in Noise
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Phonetica
- Vol. 60 (2) , 129-157
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000071450
Abstract
English nonsense consonant-vowel-consonant syllables were presented at four different signal-to-noise ratios for recognition. Information theory methods are used to analyze the response data according to segment type and phonological feature, and are consistent with previous studies showing that the consonantal contrast of voicing is more robust than place of articulation, word-initial consonants are more robust than word-final consonants, and that vowel height is more robust than vowel backing. Asymmetrical confusions are also analyzed, indicating a bias toward front vowels over back vowels. The results are interpreted as parts of phonetic explanations for synchronic and diachronic phonological patterns.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domainsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- How do humans process and recognize speech?IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 1994
- Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same informationPerception & Psychophysics, 1989
- Speech coding in the auditory nerve: III. Voiceless fricative consonantsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1984
- Perceptual integration and differentiation of spectral cues for intervocalic stop consonantsPerception & Psychophysics, 1978
- Tails of tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974
- Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual featuresThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973
- Perception of Vowels Heard in Noises of Various SpectraThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1957
- Closure Duration and the Intervocalic Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in EnglishLanguage, 1957
- Control Methods Used in a Study of the VowelsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1952