Lakatosian Consolations for Economics
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Economics and Philosophy
- Vol. 2 (1) , 127-139
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267100000821
Abstract
The F-twist is giving way to the methodology of scientific research programs. Milton Friedman's “Methodology for Economics” is being supplanted as the orthodox rationale for neoclassical economics by Imre Lakatos' account of scientific respectability. Friedman's instrumentalist thesis that theories are to be judged by the confirmation of their consequences and not the realism of their assumptions has long been widely endorsed by economists, under Paul Samuelson's catchy rubric “the F-twist.” It retains its popularity among economists who want no truck with methodology, but among the increasing number of able economists who are writing on methodology the F-twist has been surrendered, not so much because these writers have decided it is false, as because something better has finally come along.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Rhetoric of EconomicsPopulation, 1990
- What Economics is Not: An Economist's Response to RosenbergPhilosophy of Science, 1984
- The Duhem-Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in MacroeconomicsThe Economic Journal, 1982
- Toward a Theory of the History of EconomicsHistory of Political Economy, 1980
- Review Symposium : Can Economic Theory Explain Everything?Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1979
- The Methodology of Scientific Research ProgrammesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1978
- Method and Appraisal in EconomicsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1976
- The Economic Approach to Human BehaviorPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1976
- Criticism and the Growth of KnowledgePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970
- PROOFS AND REFUTATIONS (I)The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1963