Protection of pregnant swine by vaccination against leptospira infection
- 1 August 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Australian Veterinary Journal
- Vol. 59 (2) , 41-45
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1982.tb02713.x
Abstract
The protection conferred on pregnant gilts by 2 commercially available leptospira interrogans serovars pomona and tarassovi bacterins was evaluated. Gilts vaccinated either 3, 6 or 12 months prior to natural challenge with L. interrogans serovar pomona had significantly lower abortion rates (2% vs 69%) and foetal mortality rates (14% vs 57%) than unvaccinated controls. One vaccine was significantly superior to the other and contained approximately twice the number of L. interrogans serovar pomona organisms per vaccine dose. Neither vaccine protected against renal colonisation but vaccination reduced urinary excretion of leptospires. Both vaccines reduced agglutinating antibody response to infection, as measured by the microscopic agglutination (MA) test. This may prevent the detection of a carrier animal by serology. Foetal pigs did not develop specific MA titres. Cultural methods were not reliable in making a diagnosis of foetal infection. Histopathology of foetal liver and kidneys helped in making a diagnosis of foetal infection.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- RENAL LEPTOSPIROSIS IN VACCINATED PIGSAustralian Veterinary Journal, 1981
- A leptospirosis outbreak in a piggeryNew Zealand Veterinary Journal, 1979
- The Antibodies Involved in the Human Immune Response to Leptospiral InfectionJournal of Medical Microbiology, 1978
- LEPTOSPIRAL TITRES IN PIGS AFTER VACCINATIONAustralian Veterinary Journal, 1975
- LEPTOSPIROSIS IN ANIMALS AND MANAustralian Veterinary Journal, 1974
- Reproductive Disorders in Pigs. I. DiagnosisBritish Veterinary Journal, 1973
- Leptospira Antibody Formation by Porcine FoetusesResearch in Veterinary Science, 1968