DO HIGH DISCOUNT RATES DESTROY TROPICAL FORESTS
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Vol. 42 (1) , 77-85
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1991.tb00334.x
Abstract
The short‐term viewpoint implicit in high discount rates seems to favour immediate forest exploitation rather than conservation for perpetual benefits. However, the value of logging revenues increases with a lower discount rate, because of the greater weighting given to investible funds. Thus, in several theoretical models, net present value of logging increases as discount rate is lowered. In practice, however, long‐term costs of logging may also incur the weighting appropriate to investment funds; reinvestment of logging revenues may not actually take place; and lower discount rates may be appropriate for costs but not revenues. These circumstances favour conservation, the more so at lower discount rates.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Forest management in Amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development optionsForest Ecology and Management, 1989
- On a social discount rate for forestryCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 1985
- Timber Economics in the Rockies: Efficiency and Management OptionsLand Economics, 1981
- Multiple Discount Rates for Evaluating Public Forestry InvestmentsThe Forestry Chronicle, 1979
- ‘Blind Alleys and Open Prospects’ by Colin Price - A CommentForestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 1977
- Resource Conservation, Environmental Preservation, and the Rate of DiscountThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1975
- On the Social Rate of DiscountPublished by Springer Nature ,1974
- TO THE FUTURE: WITH INDIFFERENCE OR CONCERN?- THE SOCIAL DISCOUNT RATE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS IN LAND USE*Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1973
- Cost-Benefit Analysis in Relation to Plantation Development ProgrammesAustralian Forestry, 1967
- The Opportunity Costs of Public InvestmentThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1963