Spasticity

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Spasticity has been defined as velocity-dependent hyperactivity of stretch reflexes; it is therefore only one aspect of the complex syndrome produced by a lesion of the upper motoneuron. Although spasticity may be partially responsible for joint contractures, it does not produce most of the functional disability experienced by patients with upper motoneuron lesions. Paresis, fatigability, lack of dexterity, etc., account for most of these patients' complaints. The pathophysiology of spasticity is poorly understood but appears to be related to an increased excitatory state at the segmental spinal level; there is no evidence for increased sensitivity of muscle spindles in spastic patients. Several mechanisms for this increased excitability within the spinal cord have been proposed. There are different types as well as degrees of spasticity. Clinical neurophysiologic recordings of reflex activity in patients with spasticity provide the means to differentiate among the various types of spasticity, to select the therapy most likely to be effective in a particular patient, and to see the results of its employment objectively. The latter will prove whether a specific therapy is useful or not. Ablative treatment at the level of the peripheral nerve or dorsal root may be useful, particularly when spasticity is severe. Drugs such as baclofen or diazepam relieve flexor spasms but are not particularly effective against spasticity itself. Dantrolene acts to weaken muscles, but that is not often helpful. Rarely do any of these therapies increase function; there are no effective cures for paresis or related negative manifestations of chronic spasticity.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: