Bioregionalism: A comparative study of the Adirondacks and the Sierra Nevada
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Society & Natural Resources
- Vol. 10 (1) , 3-16
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929709381006
Abstract
The traditional approach to resource management emphasizes local autonomy in regulatory policy, sustained yield in resource allocation, and management by single resource. While maintaining consistency with this paradigm, a number of states have expanded their regulatory and management responsibility as resource issues and problems have outpaced the capabilities of local government to resolve them. This paper contrasts such state efforts with a new paradigm in resource management— ecosystem management. The requirement of a fundamental change in beliefs, attitudes, and values concerning the interaction of humans with their natural environment distinguishes bioregionalism from other forms of ecosystem management and provides the theoretical basis for managing resources as an interrelated whole. Addressing the specific topics of sustainable economics, empowerment, education, and equity within the context of two case study areas—the Adirondacks and the Sierra Nevada—this paper explains how bioregionalism can help to resolve environmental issues and problems.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mandates, Plans, and Planners: Building Local Commitment to Development ManagementJournal of the American Planning Association, 1994
- What Is Ecosystem Management?Conservation Biology, 1994
- Implementing Ecosystem-Based ManagementBioScience, 1993
- Local Government Protection of Biodiversity: What Is Its Niche?The University of Chicago Law Review, 1993
- Group Processes and the Social Construction of Growth Management: Florida, Vermont, and New JerseyJournal of the American Planning Association, 1992
- Eight State-Sponsored Growth Management Programs: A Comparative AnalysisJournal of the American Planning Association, 1992
- Elements of Effective State Land‐Use Planning PolicyJournal of Urban Planning and Development, 1992