Classification and study in occupation a review and discussion of taxonomies
- 1 May 1994
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Occupational Science
- Vol. 1 (3) , 3-20
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1994.9686382
Abstract
This paper identifies classification, or the building of taxonomies, as a fundamental step in the development of knowledge. The history and purposes of taxonomies are briefly reviewed, and extant taxonomies relevant to the study of occupation are examined. These classification systems are found in the psychological, sociological, and vocational literature, and address motivation, meaning, the structure and organization of intentional behaviour, personality, and human performance. The paper concludes that researchers studying occupation will need to become familiar with a diverse theoretical and methodological literature in the social and behavioural sciences before significant advances can be made.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Occupational Science is MultidimensionalAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1991
- Personal striving differentiation and affective reactivity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- Oversimplification: The Hobgoblin of Theory and Practice in Occupational TherapyCanadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1988
- A goal-affect analysis of everyday situational choicesJournal of Research in Personality, 1986
- Personality stability and its implications for clinical psychologyClinical Psychology Review, 1986
- Perceived life satisfaction and the organization of personal project systems.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- The goal structure of situationsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1980
- The objective basis of behavior units.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977
- Using a Typology of Persons and Environments to Explain Careers: Some Extensions and ClarificationsThe Counseling Psychologist, 1976
- Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.Psychological Review, 1959