Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board
Top Cited Papers
- 8 November 2006
- Vol. 107 (10) , 2346-2351
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22266
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of breast cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach, and patients are often referred to a multidisciplinary cancer clinic. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the impact of this approach on the surgical management of breast cancer. METHODS The medical records of 149 consecutive patients referred to a multidisciplinary breast cancer clinic over a 1‐year period with a diagnosis of breast cancer were reviewed retrospectively for alterations in radiologic, pathologic, surgical, and medical interpretations and the effect that these alterations had on recommendations for surgical management. RESULTS A review of the imaging studies resulted in changes in interpretations in 67 of the 149 patients studied (45%). This resulted in a change in surgical management in 11% of patients. Review of the pathology resulted in changes in the interpretation for 43 of the 149 patients (29%). Thirteen patients (9%) had surgical management changes made solely as a result of pathologic reinterpretation. In 51 patients (34%), a change in surgical management was recommended after discussion with the surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists that was not based on reinterpretation of the radiologic or pathologic findings. Overall, a second evaluation of patients referred to a multidisciplinary tumor board led to changes in the recommendations for surgical management in 77 of 149 of those patients studied (52%). CONCLUSIONS The changes in management stemmed from differences in mammographic interpretation, pathologic interpretation, and evaluation by medical and radiation oncologists and surgical breast specialists. Multidisciplinary review can provide patients with useful additional information when making difficult treatment decisions. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is expert breast pathology assessment necessary for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ?Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2004
- Eighteen‐year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapyCancer, 2003
- Changes in breast cancer therapy because of pathology second opinionsAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2002
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study Comparing Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radical Mastectomy for Early Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Performance Parameters for Screening and Diagnostic Mammography: Specialist and General RadiologistsRadiology, 2002
- The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient managementCancer, 2001
- Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Breast-Conserving Therapy With Mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1996
- Variability in Radiologists' Interpretations of MammogramsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994