Can characters be classified directly as digits vs letters or must they be identified first?
- 1 December 1973
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 1 (4) , 477-484
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208912
Abstract
Two experiments were addressed to the question of whether or not Ss can distinguish between letters and digits without identifying the characters. In Experiment I Ss attempted to identify noisy characters; a character was said to be implicitly classified correctly if the identification response, whether correct or incorrect, was in the same category vis-a-vis the letter-digit distinction as the stimulus. Implicit classification of characters for which the identification response was incorrect was very little better than chance. The task in Experiment II was to classify the characters directly. The explicit classification performance in this case was poorer than the implicit classification performance of Experiment I. The results were taken as evidence that Ss could not distinguish between letters and digits unless they could identify the characters.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Matching patterns vs matching digits: The effect of memory dependence and complexity on “same”-“different” reaction timesPerception & Psychophysics, 1972
- Categorization: A mechanism for rapid information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972
- Extremely Rapid Visual Search: The Maximum Rate of Scanning Letters for the Presence of a NumeralScience, 1971
- Classification without Identification in Visual SearchQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
- Processing time for naming and categorization of letters and numbersPerception & Psychophysics, 1971
- On the Relationship between Letter Names and Superordinate CategoriesQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- Relations between the sensory register and short-term storage in tachistoscopic recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969