Abstract
The requirement for the signals in induction of cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) has been investigated. C57BL/6 X CBA/T6 F1 spleen cells stimulated with the lectin leukoagglutinin (L-A) failed to show CTL activity in a PHA-facilitated assay, although L-A-activated splenic T cells were able to respond to T cell growth factor (TCGF). Concanavalin A (Con A) on the other hand was able to induce cytolytic activity from CTL-P, as well as to render splenic T cells responsive to TCGF. Furthermore, L-A-activated splenic T cells could generate cytolytic activity upon subsequent culture in secondary mixed leukocyte culture supernatant (2 degrees MLC SN). In contrast, EL-4-derived SN (EL-4 SN) was unable to induce cytolytic activity from L-A-activated spleen cells. In addition, proliferation of L-A-activated spleen cells cultured in EL-4 SN was similar to those cultured in 2 degrees MLC SN. Nonactivated spleen cells were totally unresponsive to both SN in proliferation and generation of CTL. Analysis of T cell clones for the production of a factor necessary for induction of cytolytic activity revealed that both cytolytic and noncytolytic T cell clones were able to produce a factor(s) for the generation of cytolytic activity from L-A-activated T cells. On the other hand, SN from certain antigen-stimulated T cell clones produced factors capable of inducing cytocytic activity by L-A-activated T cells only in the presence of EL-4 SN. Neither EL-4 SN nor cloned T cell SN alone had such a capacity. The nature of the necessary lymphokines in the SN from the clone cells or from the EL-4 is unknown. In the case of the EL-4 SN, it is not known whether the presence of TCGF plays a role or whether that role is perhaps more differentiative than proliferative. This study provides evidence that the induction of CTL from CTL-P can be dissociated into activation, which is required to render T cells responsive to second signals, and differentiation, which is mediated by two different factors.