Attempts to improve treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients: the results of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 98 (5) , 1302-1311
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v98.5.1302
Abstract
In an attempt to improve induction chemotherapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML),1314 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 induction treatments for 2 courses of DAT (daunorubicin, cytarabine, and thioguanine) 3 + 10, ADE (daunorubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide) 10 + 3 + 5, or MAC (mitoxantrone-cytarabine). The remission rate in the DAT arm was significantly better than ADE (62% vs 50%; P = .002) or MAC (62% vs 55%;P = .04). This benefit was seen in patients younger and older than 70 years. There were no differences between the induction schedules with respect to overall survival at 5 years (12% vs 8% vs 10%). A total of 226 patients were randomized to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or placebo as supportive care from day 8 after the end of treatment course 1. The remission rate or survival were not improved by G-CSF, although the median number of days to recover neutrophils to 1.0 × 109/L was reduced by 5 days. Patients who entered remission (n = 371) were randomized to stop after a third course (DAT 2 + 7) or after 6 courses, ie, a subsequent COAP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cytarabine, and prednisolone), DAT 2 + 5, and COAP. The relapse risk (81% vs 73%), disease-free survival (16% vs 23%), and overall survival at 5 years (23% vs 22%) did not differ between the 3-course or 6-course arms. In addition to a treatment duration randomization, 362 patients were randomized to receive 12-month maintenance treatment with low-dose interferon, but no benefit was seen with respect to relapse risk, disease-free survival, or overall survival.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Elderly PatientsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Elderly Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Southwest Oncology Group Study (9031)Blood, 1998
- Mitoxantrone versus daunorubicin in induction-consolidation chemotherapy--the value of low-dose cytarabine for maintenance of remission, and an assessment of prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: final report. European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Hovon Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Randomized Comparison of DAT Versus ADE as Induction Chemotherapy in Children and Younger Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Results of the Medical Research Council's 10th AML Trial (MRC AML10)Blood, 1997
- Dose intensification in acute myloid leukaemia: greater effectiveness at lower cost. Principal report of the Medical Research Council's ATML9 studyBritish Journal of Haematology, 1996
- A Controlled Study of Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Elderly Patients after Treatment for Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor after Initial Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients with Primary Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at higher age or after relapseBlood, 1991
- On the value of intensive remission-induction chemotherapy in elderly patients of 65+ years with acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized phase III study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Leukemia Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1989
- PRINCIPAL RESULTS OF THE MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S 8th ACUTE MYELOID LEUKAEMIA TRIALThe Lancet, 1986