Failure to report ethical approval in child health research: review of published papers
- 11 August 2001
- Vol. 323 (7308) , 318-319
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7308.318
Abstract
We reviewed all research reports related to child health (involving patients JAMA, New England Journal of Medicine, Pediatrics, Journal of Pediatrics, Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine). Each report was reviewed independently by two research assistants for any statement about informed consent or ethics committee approval; if either statement was present, the report was categorised as having ethical approval. An article that referred to another publication for more details was not reviewed. This approach has been used previously.2 All five journals require studies with human participants to report ethical approval. Reports not describing approval were reviewed again by an investigator to ensure that errors in categorisation of the studies had not been made. Studies were also categorised according to design. The ethics committee at Boston University School of Medicine judged that this project did not represent research involving human subjects and did not require review.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Informed consent: the intricaciesBMJ, 1997
- Institutional Review Board Approval and Publication of Human Research ResultsJAMA, 1997
- Disclosure to the reader of institutional review board approval and informed consent.1997
- Disclosure to the Reader of Institutional Review Board Approval and Informed ConsentJAMA, 1997
- Informed consent in biomedical studies on aging: survey of four journalsBMJ, 1996