Positivism in sociological research: USA and UK (1966–1990) 1
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Sociology
- Vol. 53 (4) , 639-657
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0007131022000021524
Abstract
Positivism has been declared dead in sociological theory circles, yet questions remain as to its viability among researchers. The authors present diagnostic evidence about positivism in sociological practice through a content analysis of journal articles published in the late 1960s and the late 1980s in the sociological journals of the USA and Britain. Using an index based on seven elements of positivism that were characteristic of the ‘theory construction’ movement of the late 1960s, the authors find evidence of the effects of time and nation on the use of positivism. Disaggregation of the index reveals that most of the observed change is associated with the elements of ‘instrumental’ positivism, particularly statistics. The results raise questions about the relationship between theory and research and about sociologists’ philosophies of science.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Life of the mind: The interface of psychopharmaceuticals, domestic economies, and social abandonmentAmerican Ethnologist, 2004
- If Not Positivism, Then Why Is Sociology Important?Canadian Journal of Sociology, 1992
- Positivism Redivivus? A Critique of Recent Uncritical Proposals for Reforming Sociological Theory (And Related Foibles)Canadian Journal of Sociology, 1992
- Positivism's Future: And Sociology'sCanadian Journal of Sociology, 1991
- Positivism's Twilight?Canadian Journal of Sociology, 1990
- Sociology: Proscience or Antiscience?American Sociological Review, 1989
- Rethinking Macrosociological TheoryAmerican Sociological Review, 1988
- Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial PerspectiveFeminist Studies, 1988
- On the eve: a prospect in retrospectPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1985
- Is Status Attainment Research Atheoretical?American Sociological Review, 1978