The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Research
- Vol. 56 (3) , 130-135
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00419699
Abstract
According to the dimensional-overlap model (Kornblum, 1992), irrelevant dimensions that overlap with a stimulus dimension (e. g., Stroop-type stimuli) are processed by a different stage than those that overlap with the response (e. g., Simon-type stimuli). We show that the effects of these two types of overlap are additive, thus supporting the model's hypothesis. We also show that the time course of facilitation and interference is different for these two types of overlap.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--A model and taxonomy.Psychological Review, 1990
- The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-timeActa Psychologica, 1975
- Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch taskPerception & Psychophysics, 1974
- Attention demands of memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972
- Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969
- Reactions toward the source of stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967
- S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954
- S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953