Measurement of Urinary Oxalate: An Enzymatic and an Ion Chromatographic Method Compared
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in cclm
- Vol. 25 (2) , 95-100
- https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1987.25.2.95
Abstract
An ion chromatographic and an enzymatic method for determination of oxalic acid in urine were compared on the basis of reliability and practicability. Both methods displayed a within-run imprecision of under 5% and a total imprecision of under 10%. The mean recovery of 0.2 mmol/l sodium oxalate lay close to 100% for both methods. After 80 parallel determinations, both methods produced statistically identical results. In terms of cost per analysis, ion chromatography is the method currently preferred when large numbers of samples are involved. If only a few samples are to be analysed the enzymatic method .sbd. without any loss of reliability .sbd. can be employed.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention of ascorbic acid interference in the measurement of oxalic acid in urine by ion-chromatographyClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 1984
- Comparison of Several Regression Procedures for Method Comparison Studies and Determination of Sample Sizes Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part IIcclm, 1984
- A New Biometrical Procedure for Testing the Equality of Measurements from Two Different Analytical Methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part Icclm, 1983
- The determination of oxalate in urine and urinary calculi by a new ion-chromatographic techniqueClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 1982
- Determination of Urinary Oxalate by Ion Chromatography: Preliminary ObservationJournal of Urology, 1982
- Sampling errors in the determination of urine calcium and oxalate: Solubility of calcium oxalate in HCL-urine mixturesClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 1981