Statistical evaluation of learning curve effects in surgical trials
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Trials
- Vol. 1 (5) , 421-427
- https://doi.org/10.1191/1740774504cn042oa
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery have been impeded by concerns that improvements in the technical performance of a new technique over time (a “learning curve”) may distort comparisons. The statistical assessment of learning curves in trials has received little attention. In this paper, we discuss what a learning curve effect is, the factors which effect it, how to display it, and how to incorporate the learning effect into the trial analysis. Bayesian hierarchical models are proposed to adjust the trial results for the existence of a learning curve effect. The implications for trial evaluation and data collection are considered.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and FitJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2002
- Monitoring of large randomised clinical trials: a new approach with Bayesian methodsThe Lancet, 2001
- Assessing operative skillBMJ, 1999
- The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsuturedBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- D2 gastrectomy: Lessons from a prospective audit of the learning curveBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patientsThe Lancet, 1995
- Extensive lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients: what can the results of one trial tell us?The Lancet, 1995
- Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectationsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Knot security of synthetic absorbable suture material; a comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglactin-910European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1985