Differences in the post‐translational modifications of human papillomavirus type 6b major capsid protein expressed from a baculovirus system compared with a vaccinia virus system

Abstract
Virus-like particles (VLPs) are being currently investigated in vaccines against viral infections in humans. There are different recombinant-protein-expression systems available for obtaining the necessary VLP preparation for vaccination. However, the differences in post-translational modifications of the recombinant proteins obtained and their differences in efficacy in eliciting an anti-viral response in vaccines are not well established. In this study we have compared the post-translational modifications of human papillomavirus type-6b major capsid protein L1 (HPV 6bL1) expressed using recombinant baculovirus (rBV) in Sf9 (Spodoptera frugiperda) insect cells, with the protein expressed using recombinant vaccinia virus (rVV) in CV-1 kidney epithelial cells. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of biosynthetically labelled rBV-expressed HPV 6bL1 showed several post-translationally modified variants of the protein, whereas rVV-expressed HPV 6bL1 showed only a few variants. Phosphorylations were detected at threonine and serine residues for the L1 expressed from rBV compared with phosphorylation at serine residues only for the L1 expressed from rVV. HPV 6bL1 expressed using rBV incorporated [(3)H]mannose and [(3)H]galactose, whereas HPV 6bL1 expressed using rVV incorporated only [(3)H]galactose. We conclude that post-translational modification of recombinant HPV 6bL1 can differ according to the system used for its expression. Since recombinant L1 protein is a potential human-vaccine candidate, the implication of the observed differences in post-translational modifications on immunogenicity of L1 VLPs warrants investigation.