Economic outcomes associated with olanzapine versus risperidone in the treatment of uncontrolled schizophrenia
- 27 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 20 (7) , 1039-1048
- https://doi.org/10.1185/030079904125004097
Abstract
Objective: This study, based upon a database analysis, compares a one-year drug treatment course (duration of therapy, concomitant use of typical antipsychotics, anxiolytics/antidepressants or anti-Parkinsonians) and direct health care costs of uncontrolled schizophrenia patients initiated on olanzapine versus risperidone. Methods: The integrated medical and pharmacy claims of a large, geographically diverse, commercially insured population of 1.6 million employees, retirees and dependents were used to conduct this analysis. Patients who initiated outpatient treatment with either olanzapine or risperidone (no prescription for olanzapine or risperidone during a 1-year period prior to the initiation) and with uncontrolled schizophrenia were included. Drug treatment course and associated health care costs (calculated based on charges) during the subsequent 12-month period were examined using univariate and multivariate methods. Results: 431 patients initiated on risperidone and 142 initiated on olanzapine met the inclusion criteria. The mean dose was 4.34 and 11.00 mg/day for risperidone and olanzapine, respectively. Olanzapine was associated with more favorable drug treatment course than risperidone. Although pharmaceutical costs were significantly higher, medical costs were significantly lower for patients on olanzapine compared to those on risperidone. Univariate and multivariate analyses (controlling for potential confounding factors including demographic and clinical characteristics) consistently demonstrated that olanzapine patients had significantly lower schizophrenia related costs ($2839 less, p < 0.011), lower mental health care costs ($3744 less, p < 0.004) and lower total health care costs ($4674 less, p < 0.001) than those patients initiated on risperidone. Conclusions: The findings revealed significant differences between olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of uncontrolled schizophrenia patients in clinical practice. Olanzapine patients experienced a favorable drug treatment course and incurred lower overall costs. The lower costs were hospital-treatment driven. Further studies are needed to examine if these results hold for different patient populations.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adherence to Treatment With Antipsychotic Medication and Health Care Costs Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With SchizophreniaAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2004
- Consensus Statement: Consensus Development Conference on Antipsychotic Drugs and Obesity and DiabetesThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2004
- Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?Journal of Health Economics, 2001
- A Randomized Double-Blind Study of Risperidone and Olanzapine in the Treatment of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective DisorderAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2001
- Patient Compliance with Drug Therapy in SchizophreniaPharmacoEconomics, 2000
- METHODS FOR ANALYZING HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION AND COSTSAnnual Review of Public Health, 1999
- Costs of schizophreniaThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1997
- The difference in mean costs as a pharmacoeconomic outcome variable: Power considerationsControlled Clinical Trials, 1997
- Radioreceptor Binding Profile of the Atypical Antipsychotic OlanzapineNeuropsychopharmacology, 1996
- Assessment Issues and the Cost of SchizophreniaSchizophrenia Bulletin, 1991