Microvascular pressures and resistances in the left ventricular subepicardium and subendocardium.
- 1 September 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation Research
- Vol. 69 (3) , 561-570
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.69.3.561
Abstract
These experiments tested the hypothesis that differences in the distribution of subepicardial and subendocardial microvascular resistances may alter the transmural distributions of microvascular pressures. Isolated blood- and physiological saline-perfused porcine hearts were surgically incised to enable exposure of the subendocardial and subepicardial microcirculations. Microvascular pressures were measured during cardiac arrest and maximal vasodilation at various perfusion pressures to formulate relations between perfusion pressure and microvascular pressure in the different subendocardial (both free wall and papillary muscle) and subepicardial segments. Measurements of arteriolar and venular pressures in both myocardial regions were performed in comparably sized vessels (80-120 microns in diameter). At a coronary perfusion pressure of 100 mm Hg, subendocardial arteriolar and venular pressures were 60 +/- 4 and 33 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively. In contrast, at the same coronary perfusion pressure, arteriolar and venular pressures in the subepicardial microcirculation averaged 80 +/- 6 and 22 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively (p less than 0.05 versus subendocardium). At all levels of coronary perfusion pressure, arteriolar pressures were significantly lower in the subendocardium than in the subepicardium (p less than 0.05). Venular pressures were also higher in the subendocardial microcirculation than in the subepicardial microcirculation at all but the lowest perfusion pressure (p less than 0.05). The relative distribution of resistances in arteries, microvessels, and veins was also different between the subepicardium and subendocardium. Specifically, in the subendocardium, arterial and venous resistances were higher, percentage-wise, but microvascular resistance was proportionately lower than that in the subepicardium (p less than 0.05). From these data, it is concluded that the distribution of microvascular resistances and pressures is different during maximal vasodilation in the subepicardial and subendocardial microcirculations of the left ventricle. It is also speculated that differences in autoregulatory capacity and vulnerability to ischemia may be partially related to unequal distribution of microvascular resistances across the wall of the left ventricle.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coronary collateral reserve during exercise induced ischemia in swineBasic Research in Cardiology, 1989
- Morphometric study of the total and perfused arteriolar and capillary network of the rabbit left ventricleCardiovascular Research, 1985
- Interaction Between Intramyocardial Pressure (IMP) and Myocardial CirculationJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1985
- Arteriolar proliferation in the rat cremaster muscle as a long-term autoregulatory response to reduced perfusionMicrovascular Research, 1984
- Stereomorphological arrangement of capillaries in skeletal muscle in normal and stenosed young and adult ratsMicrovascular Research, 1984
- Intramyocardial pressure and distribution of coronary blood flow during systole and diastole in the horseCardiovascular Research, 1982
- Dilatory capacity of the coronary circulation and its correlation to the arterial vasculature in the canine left ventricleBasic Research in Cardiology, 1977
- Evolution of regional ischemia distal to a proximal coronary stenosis: Self-propagation of ischemiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- Pressure measurements in the mammalian microvasculatureMicrovascular Research, 1970