The Criticism of Inferential Statistics
- 1 November 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Research
- Vol. 19 (1) , 35-40
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188760190104
Abstract
I am aware that the general reader will usually pass by any article which has the word ‘statistics’ in its title. My main preoccupation, therefore, has been to try to make this short review as appealing as possible to the classroom teacher, the administrator, and the politician, and to hope that it may perhaps have some influence on their educational decisions. The conclusion is that the education service should downgrade in importance those research conclusions which lean heavily upon inferential statistics for their authority, on the grounds that there have been many warnings published concerning the damage that inferential statistics can do, or have already done, to the progress of the social sciences. In a brief postscript to this, evidence is offered of the increasing use of these same techniques in educational research.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 1975
- Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- STATISTICAL INFERENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL ORGANISM RESEARCH: MIXED BLESSING OR CURSE?1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974
- A Review of Three Journals for 1968‐70Educational Research, 1974
- Scientific method and the adversary model: Some preliminary thoughts.American Psychologist, 1974
- Interpreting Research: SamplingEducational Research, 1974
- A new tabulation of statistical procedures used in APA journals.American Psychologist, 1974
- EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: A THREE‐YEAR REVIEW (1968‐70)Educational Research, 1973
- Fads, fashions, and folderol in psychology.American Psychologist, 1966
- The Place of Statistics in PsychologyEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960