Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h indexExtent of and reasons for type I and type II errors
- 1 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Informetrics
- Vol. 1 (3) , 204-213
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.01.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicantsScientometrics, 2006
- Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groupsScientometrics, 2006
- Using the h‐index to rank influential information scientistssJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006
- The h index and career assessment by numbersTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2006
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005
- Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisionsScientometrics, 2005
- Measuring SciencePublished by Springer Nature ,2004