Use of a Continuous-Flow Device in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 30 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 357 (9) , 885-896
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067758
Abstract
The use of left ventricular assist devices is an accepted therapy for patients with refractory heart failure, but current pulsatile volume-displacement devices have limitations (including large pump size and limited long-term mechanical durability) that have reduced widespread adoption of this technology. Continuous-flow pumps are newer types of left ventricular assist devices developed to overcome some of these limitations. In a prospective, multicenter study without a concurrent control group, 133 patients with end-stage heart failure who were on a waiting list for heart transplantation underwent implantation of a continuous-flow pump. The principal outcomes were the proportions of patients who, at 180 days, had undergone transplantation, had cardiac recovery, or had ongoing mechanical support while remaining eligible for transplantation. We also assessed functional status and quality of life. The principal outcomes occurred in 100 patients (75%). The median duration of support was 126 days (range, 1 to 600). The survival rate during support was 75% at 6 months and 68% at 12 months. At 3 months, therapy was associated with significant improvement in functional status (according to the New York Heart Association class and results of a 6-minute walk test) and in quality of life (according to the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy questionnaires). Major adverse events included postoperative bleeding, stroke, right heart failure, and percutaneous lead infection. Pump thrombosis occurred in two patients. A continuous-flow left ventricular assist device can provide effective hemodynamic support for a period of at least 6 months in patients awaiting heart transplantation, with improved functional status and quality of life. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00121472.)Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- History of Mechanical Circulatory SupportPublished by Springer Nature ,2017
- Results of a multicenter clinical trial with the Thoratec Implantable Ventricular Assist Device⁎⁎Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif.The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2007
- Executive Summary for the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Next Generation Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination TherapySeminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Third Annual Report—2005⁎ ⁎All figures and tables from this report, and a more comprehensive set of ISHLT registry slides are available at www.ishlt.org/registries/The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2005
- Worldwide Experience With the MicroMed DeBakey Ventricular Assist Device® as a Bridge to TransplantationCirculation, 2003
- Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2001
- HeartMate II left ventricular assist system: from concept to first clinical useThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Improved outcomes with an implantable left ventricular assist system: a multicenter studyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- Improved Mortality and Rehabilitation of Transplant Candidates Treated with a Long-Term Implantable Left Ventricular Assist SystemAnnals of Surgery, 1995