Perceived value of providing peer reviewers with abstracts and preprints of related published and unpublished papers.

Open Access

15 July 1998

journal article
conference paper
Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA

Vol. 280 (3) , 273-274
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.273

Abstract

Many journals provide peer reviewers with written instructions regarding review criteria, such as the originality of results, but little research has been done to investigate ways to improve or facilitate the peer review task.

Keywords

PERCEIVED VALUE
REVIEW TASK
WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS
UNPUBLISHED PAPERS
INVESTIGATE WAYS
RELATED PUBLISHED
JOURNALS PROVIDE
REGARDING REVIEW
PROVIDING PEER

This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:

Redundant Publications
Published by Springer Nature ,2017
Editors’ Requests of Peer Reviewers: A Study and a Proposal
Preventive Medicine, 1996
Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable
Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1993