The point of no return in planar hand movements: an indication of the existence of high level motion primitives
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Cognitive Neurodynamics
- Vol. 1 (4) , 341-358
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-007-9025-x
Abstract
Previous psychophysical studies have sought to determine whether the processes of movement engagement and termination are dissociable, whether stopping an action is a generic process, and whether there is a point in time in which the generation of a planned action is inevitable (“point of no return”). It is not clear yet, however, whether the action of stopping is merely a manifestation of low level, dynamic constraints, or whether it is also subject to a high level, kinematic plan. In the present study, stopping performance was studied while nine subjects, who generated free scribbling movements looking for the location of an invisible circular target, were requested unexpectedly to impede movement. Temporal analysis of the data shows that in 87% of the movements subsequent to the ‘stop’ cue, the tangential motion velocity profile was not a decelerating function of the time but rather exhibited a complex pattern comprised of one or more velocity peaks, implying an unstoppable motion element. Furthermore, geometrical analysis shows that the figural properties of the path generated after the ‘stop’ cue were part of a repetitive geometrical pattern and that the probability of completing a pattern after the ‘stop’ cue was correlated with the relative advance in the geometrical plan rather than the amount of time that had elapsed from the pattern initiation. Altogether, these findings suggest that the “point of no return” phenomenon in humans may also reflect a high level kinematic plan and could serve as a new operative definition of motion primitives.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Behavioral Evaluation of Movement CancellationJournal of Neurophysiology, 2006
- Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigmScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2005
- Inhibiting prepared and ongoing responses: Is there more than one kind of stopping?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004
- Individual stopping times and cognitive control: Converging evidence for the stop signal task from a continuous tracking paradigmThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 2003
- Inhibitory Control Differences Following Mild Head InjuryBrain and Cognition, 1999
- Development of inhibitory control across the life span.Developmental Psychology, 1999
- A horse race between independent processes: Evidence for a phantom point of no return in the preparation of a speeded motor response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1997
- Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995
- Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995
- Interruptibility of speechThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973